← Search

Gena Standridge

Starkville, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 21W–34L · seasons 2023–2025

Captains: add Gena Standridge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2025-04-01 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Torricelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-24 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-02-25 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Gunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-24 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-02-18 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-02-04 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-08-26 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Candis Pizzetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Lori Williams / Melanie McLeod
2024-08-19 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-12 · LeDuff, Stacie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Leslie Royals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2024-08-06 · Coins, Jimmie · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tempestt Gilmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-20 · Coins, Jimmie · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aquilino Escaner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-06-19 · LeDuff, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jan Woodson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 46.1% of games
3.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.3% of games
6.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.8% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal