← Search

Robin Oldt

— year-end
83 matches · 42W–41L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Robin Oldt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Woodlake Cooksey · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-20 · Woodlake Cooksey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Hannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Nancy Priddy / Pamela Hughes
2026-07-16 · Woodlake Cooksey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Giangregorio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · Woodlake Cooksey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tammy McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · 21 Woodlake Kelly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Zielinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Woodlake Cooksey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Giangregorio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-25 · Woodlake Cooksey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Giangregorio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · 21 Woodlake Kelly · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · 21 Woodlake Kelly · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy McElgunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-06 · Woodlake - Poindexter/Estes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-01 · Woodlake ODonnell 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · 21 Woodlake Kelly · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
48.6%
18W–19L · 48.1% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
63%
17W–10L · 53% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams