← Search

Mary Spagnolo

— year-end
40 matches · 9W–31L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Mary Spagnolo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-09-12 · RMC - Sweeney/Muncy · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eliza Causey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-06 · RMC - Sweeney/Muncy · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cynthia Muncy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · RMC - Sweeney/Muncy · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Keyes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · RMC - Sweeney/Muncy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Albon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · RMC Sherdel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Lyons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Sarah Boyd / Julie Nobles
2026-07-25 · RMC Sherdel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberley Dages
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · RMC Sherdel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · RMC Sherdel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Schwartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · RMC Sherdel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Grammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-06 · RMC Racquettes - Muncy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eliza Causey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · RMC Racquettes - Muncy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · KC Ladies - Surratt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katherine Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.7% of games
3.5
19%
4W–17L · 38.8% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.8% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams