← Search

Brooke Webb

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 113W–118L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brooke Webb to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history231 matches
W
2026-09-03 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eden Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-27 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Baur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-16 · CACM YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brad Webb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Bach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · CACM YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tom Peters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brad Webb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-02 · CACM YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brad Webb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Gralla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-16 · CACM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · CACM GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with James Bach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-1
W
2026-07-09 · CACM TEAL · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Baur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50.5%
50W–49L · 52.7% of games
3.5
48.1%
25W–27L · 51.8% of games
6.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 55.7% of games
6.5mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
26.3%
5W–14L · 39.9% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
97 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams