← Search

Jacqueline Iversen

Lloyd Harbor, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 42W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jacqueline Iversen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-08-12 · HIT, Saliou/Fracasso (D) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Schuman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-27 · HIT, Rossetti (D) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janine Prestegaard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · HIT, Saliou/Fracasso (D) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorena Trabucco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · HIT, Rossetti (D) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne Rossetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-12 · HIT, Rossetti (D) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joanne Rossetti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · Park Ave, Cadorette · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Serventi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · Huntington, Wallace/Rottkamp · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lloyd Gittler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-26 · HIT, Brandt/Kull · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-19 · Park Ave, Cadorette · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Rosenblatt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Huntington, Wallace/Rottkamp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcel Riffaud mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 54.9% of games
4.0
31.8%
7W–15L · 42.4% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 56.1% of games
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe