← Search

Deborah Cichon

Farmingdale, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 48W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Cichon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-08-17 · Roslyn, Goodman/Eitel (D) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lydia Eitel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · Morley, Cornacchia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Veronica Mangini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-5
L
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Emma Brandt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · Roslyn, Goodman/Eitel (D) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lydia Eitel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6
W
2026-07-27 · Morley, Cornacchia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Veronica Mangini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Mona Giovanni championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-23 · Roslyn, Goodman/Eitel (D) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lydia Eitel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-21 · HIT, Giovanni/Kleinberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mona Giovanni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-13 · Morley, Cornacchia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann McGrath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Roslyn, Goodman/Eitel (D) · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Simone Crames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6
L
2026-06-23 · Roslyn, Goodman/Eitel (D) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alistaire Bambach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · HIT, Giovanni/Kleinberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mona Giovanni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
61.5%
16W–10L · 53.4% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.2% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
56.8%
25W–19L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer