← Search

Christina Cook

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 50W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christina Cook to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-07-02 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Jakotich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Summer Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Jakotich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · STC-Suver · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Blakeslee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · STC-Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · STC-Blakeslee · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Blakeslee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-09 · STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Willemijn de Clercq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · STC-Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Blakeslee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · STC-Blakeslee · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-26 · STC-Blakeslee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meghan Zech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · STC-Suver · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Scher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · STC-Blakeslee · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-11 · STC-Suver · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Willemijn de Clercq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
53.6%
30W–26L · 52.5% of games
4.5
25%
3W–9L · 42.5% of games
4.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 52.3% of games
9.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#2 Singles
12%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert