← Search

Elizabeth MacPherson

Ridgeland, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 27W–30L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth MacPherson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Mincey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · Coffey, Celia · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leslie Ledoux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
Nancy Thompson / Lisa Tew
2026-07-27 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Lori Williams / Lisa Little
2026-07-21 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tara Baugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tara Baugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Pool
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Suzy Everett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · Coffey, Celia · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-13 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-06 · Coffey, Celia · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-30 · Coffey, Celia · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 56.3% of games
4.0
32%
8W–17L · 42.3% of games
7.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.6% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#1 Singles
25%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
11%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova