← Search

Allison Mayers

Hattiesburg, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 71W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Allison Mayers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
Guadalupe Tocci Blanco / Haley Thompson
2026-08-31 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Katie Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Hannah Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Gianola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-03 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Gianola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · Stetelman 3.5-4.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carly Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Gianola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · Weeks-HCC 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Gianola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-28 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wesley Bailey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · Do, Jennifer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tan Do mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Pratt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · Do, Jennifer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Sims mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
8W–2L · 61.7% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 55.3% of games
6.5
90%
9W–1L · 64.8% of games
7.5
75%
6W–2L · 59.7% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.5% of games
3.5mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 62.2% of games
4.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
15 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert