← Search

Niels Christiansen

— year-end
44 matches · 27W–17L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Niels Christiansen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2025-07-29 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Roche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-12 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nathan Treloar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-06-14 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Roche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-04-27 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Nickoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-23 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2024-05-19 · BAY:Western Massacre:Schaffer/Baxter · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Epstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-05-18 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Seibert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
Hans Doup / Robert Campbell
2024-04-27 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Seibert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2024-03-24 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Clancy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-03-16 · BAY:Western Massacre:Schaffer/Baxter · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Epstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2024-03-02 · BAY:Amherst Aces: Hirsh · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Clancy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-12-10 · BAY:Amherst Gents:Roche · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Teams11 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 45.4% of games
8.0
71%
22W–9L · 60.7% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert