← Search

Jeffrey Madia

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 95W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Madia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
W
2026-09-13 · TOC.Madia · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Thomas McEvoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-30 · TOC.Madia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-09 · TOC.Madia · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-28 · Je.Madia55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Weygandt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
Suzanne Brown / Alan Crews
2026-07-26 · Je.Madia55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Patton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · Je.Madia55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maureen Sredl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-3
W
William Adams / Susan Fekete
2026-07-07 · ACP.Madia · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maureen Sredl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
Susan Fekete / William Adams
2026-06-30 · ACP.Madia · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Maureen Sredl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-24 · Je.Madia55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · ACP.Madia · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Hiller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
William Merlo / George Jackson
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · with David Bruner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · with David Bruner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
52.6%
20W–18L · 52.3% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
74.3%
26W–9L · 58.5% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.9% of games
4.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 56.5% of games
8.0mixed
72.7%
16W–6L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe