← Search

Larry Essary

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
248 matches · 110W–138L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Larry Essary to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history248 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Da.McNeill55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Henrion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-26 · La.Leins40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frank Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-25 · Da.McNeill55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-18 · Da.McNeill55C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Henrion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-12 · La.Leins40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Frank Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-28 · Je.Chaffin55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Sprague mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
Daniel Knox / Mark Combs
2026-07-26 · Ma.Zimmerman55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Larry Leins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Je.Chaffin55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Rhoades mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Ma.Zimmerman55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Je.Chaffin55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Sprague mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-30 · Da.McNeill55A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David McNeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-16 · Da.McNeill55A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Chaffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40.2%
43W–64L · 46.7% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 43.8% of games
7.5
43.1%
25W–33L · 46.3% of games
8.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 51% of games
4.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 50.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
15W–5L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
95 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
74 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer