← Search

Dana Weiland

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
298 matches · 171W–127L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Weiland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history298 matches
L
2026-09-04 · St.Rabby40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · An.Pfeiffer55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Fleming
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · St.Rabby40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · Da.Weiland18C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jackie Gore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-21 · St.Rabby40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · TOC.Ostrander · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lori Petty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · St.Rabby55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John VanDeWater mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · St.Rabby55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-2
L
2026-07-08 · St.Rabby55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John VanDeWater mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · St.Rabby55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dayn Harum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-03 · St.Rabby55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Combs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Tiffany Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
65.3%
77W–41L · 56.2% of games
7.5
54.2%
26W–22L · 50.7% of games
8.5
50.8%
33W–32L · 47.7% of games
4.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
42.9%
9W–12L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
155 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
46 matches
#1 Singles
5%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe