← Search

Amy Demsko

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
236 matches · 101W–135L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Demsko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history236 matches
W
2026-09-03 · TOC.Derks · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosanne Facktor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Wilda Eade / Kristin Anderson
2026-08-18 · TOC.Campbell · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Liz Railton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · TOC.Campbell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Liz Railton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-03 · TOC.Myer · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Liz Railton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · TOC.Campbell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Myer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-04-09 · TOC.Campbell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Gagnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-02 · TOC.Campbell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nadine Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-24 · TOC.Cardella · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-23 · TOC.Hargrove · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nadine Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-22 · TOC.Hargrove · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-17 · TOC.Cardella · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-10 · TOC.Cardella · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
59.3%
54W–37L · 55.4% of games
3.5
29.1%
16W–39L · 43.1% of games
6.5
34.6%
28W–53L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 58% of the time
#3 Doubles
58%
137 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe