← Search

Wilda Eade

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 39W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Wilda Eade to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-09-09 · ACP.Schoots · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonnie Delmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-09-08 · KF.Lee · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · ACP.Schoots · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bonnie Delmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · KF.Lee · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · KF.Lee · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · TOC.Clark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-18 · TOC.Clark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Pigora mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · TOC.Clark · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carlos Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · KF.Lee · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alice Schoots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · TOC.Clark · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel McDonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · KF.Lee · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · TOC.Clark · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
39%
23W–36L · 45% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 29.9% of games
6.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 46.6% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 54% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert