← Search

Craig Cardella

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 53W–72L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Craig Cardella to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
L
2026-08-30 · TOC.Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tom Larrichio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Javalkar · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Klemenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · TOC.Javalkar · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with James Klemenz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · TOC.Adams · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tom Larrichio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · TOC.Javalkar · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Bruner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-07-27 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rodney Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-11 · TOC.Javalkar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claude Ruffieux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · TOC.Javalkar · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Nealis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · TOC.Javalkar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Bruner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Tabelon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Nealis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-30 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steven Gloer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.4% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.8%
25W–13L · 56.4% of games
4.5
15.6%
5W–27L · 33.4% of games
8.5
40%
12W–18L · 46.3% of games
9.0
20%
1W–4L · 45.2% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#3 Singles
6%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer