← Search

James Klemenz

Fuquay Varina, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
321 matches · 189W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Klemenz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history321 matches
W
2026-09-13 · CAS.Wysocki · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · To.Larrichio55C · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with George Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · Jo.Diamond55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Ferris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-23 · CAS.Wysocki · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brett Allan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Javalkar · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Craig Cardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-18 · Jo.Diamond55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Ferris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-14 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laura Weygandt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · JByrd-NCCU · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Noga
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-09 · CAS.Wysocki · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brendan Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · TOC.Javalkar · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Craig Cardella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-12 · CAS.Labie · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rodney Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-05 · TOC.Javalkar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nannette Goodwin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
65.7%
115W–60L · 55.9% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
59.4%
38W–26L · 55.2% of games
8.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
118 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
95 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal