← Search

Vembakkam Sampath

— year-end
147 matches · 68W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vembakkam Sampath to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-05-03 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-22 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bart Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-22 · Yoder (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Rechtlich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-4
L
2026-02-07 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-4
W
2026-02-01 · Yoder (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-18 · Yoder (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-01-11 · Yoder (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · Ackermann/Rigby (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Feder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-14 · Yoder (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · Yoder (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Luebbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · Yoder (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
Teams32 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games
3.5
52.7%
48W–43L · 51% of games
4.0
32.6%
15W–31L · 44.7% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
44 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert