← Search

Catherine Donovan

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 56W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Donovan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2025-10-10 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elaine Overlund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Hanley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2023-10-21 · Lung Busters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Capp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2023-03-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kech Carera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2023-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Candi Baranski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kech Carera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-01-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laury Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2022-12-03 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2022-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Capp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2022-10-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
67.2%
39W–19L · 55.1% of games
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 41% of games
7.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 49.7% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova