← Search

Brenda Christy

Lakewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 75W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brenda Christy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-06 · RHCC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lia Baros
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-23 · RHCC YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valerie VanAlsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Gallagher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mindi Pearse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia McVey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jody Alderman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-17 · #2 Doubles · with Rachel Kacmar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Kacmar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-07-17 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Kacmar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
N/A
2025-06-19 · RHCC RED · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.3% of games
3.0
82.5%
33W–7L · 64.6% of games
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 56.5% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King