← Search

Keri Davis

— year-end
59 matches · 30W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Keri Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
L
2026-03-23 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-23 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-09 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-09 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-02 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-26 · SAZ 65/ 7.0 W- Frances Freidlander · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-19 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-14 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-01-12 · Prickly Pairs · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Marshall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-12 · Prickly Pairs · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Zimmerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Paregien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-04-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathryn Manthey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams4 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 55% of games
7.0
50%
21W–21L · 49.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert