← Search

Jaime Lewis

Frederick, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 49W–62L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jaime Lewis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Thonphok - Thongphok40+8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Juan Jose Tijero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Thonphok - Thongphok40+8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Justin Cady mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-27 · Hathaway 18+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jodi Hathaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-06 · Hathaway 18+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Wagner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · Lewis 40+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecelia Biesecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · Lewis - 4.5Fred Groundies & Lobs · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-03 · Lee 9.0 18+ MoCo · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Austin Blake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Spicer - Spicegirls 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecelia Biesecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-27 · Lee 9.0 18+ MoCo · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Iosua Malaki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · Lewis 40+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecelia Biesecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-14 · Spicer - Spicegirls 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecelia Biesecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · Lewis Tri High · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cecelia Biesecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.3% of games
4.0
56.8%
21W–16L · 51.7% of games
4.5
9.5%
2W–19L · 34.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 55.4% of games
8.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer