← Search

Kara Sargent

Salt Lake City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 56W–33L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kara Sargent to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
Joanne Sposito / Hannah Shirkey
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Heidi Gordon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
Y Lan Khuong
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Christina Eischeid championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Katherine Rist
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-29 · Utah/Vietor/18&Over/4.5W · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christina Eischeid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-04 · Utah/Vietor/18&Over/4.5W · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Julie Arfmann
2025-08-09 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Brittany Mayfield / Amber Sparks
2025-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Foy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
80%
4W–1L · 69.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
79.5%
35W–9L · 61.5% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 41.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.2% of games
8.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 33% of the time
#1 Singles
33%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#2 Singles
19%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova