← Search

Pamela Kokoszka

— year-end
107 matches · 41W–66L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Pamela Kokoszka to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2025-07-20 · 40 Love (Rhoads) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brandon Edstrom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-13 · 40 Love (Rhoads) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Allen Capdeboscq mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
Nancy Brown / David Busker
2025-06-22 · 40 Love (Rhoads) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Rhoads mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-07 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-03-31 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Charlotte French
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-03 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-02-07 · McAllister/Rigby (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Lamartina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-02-03 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Horina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-27 · Rhoads Day Crew (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2024-12-08 · McAllister/Rigby (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Ann Boschert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-11-24 · McAllister/Rigby (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Ann Boschert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-11-10 · McAllister/Rigby (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Lamartina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams18 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
41.7%
40W–56L · 48.7% of games
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 37.1% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams