← Search

Jeff Nerenberg

Plymouth Meeting, PA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 12W–17L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Jeff Nerenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
L
Alex Hamilton / Eric Zajac
2024-08-20 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jimmy Kaufman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jimmy Kaufman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Spergel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2023-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanjeev Midha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
John Jahoda / David Miller
2023-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frank Trapani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
Ken Anderson / Brandon Wiegand
2023-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
Cesar Pernia / Kurt Althouse
2023-04-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Patrick McGuigan / Guillermo Bernal
2022-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Venneri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Jeremy Rothman / Sergey Taver
2022-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Albert LaBrusciano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.4% of games
4.5
0%
0W–8L · 31.1% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova