← Search

Kimberly Ritter

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 58W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Ritter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history140 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Birnbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Gallegos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-21 · Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jen Stites
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-07 · 13 Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brooke Teefey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · 13 Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-12 · 13 Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5
W
2026-06-09 · 13 Woodlake Ritter/Glen · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peggy McElgunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Woodlake - Glen/Fath · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Brady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · Woodlake - Glen/Fath · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Shick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Woodlake - Glen/Fath · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kati Shick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.5% of games
4.0
40.4%
36W–53L · 45.3% of games
7.5
29.6%
8W–19L · 45.6% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
34 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe