← Search

Richard Anderson

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 36W–26L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Richard Anderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-08-05 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Steven Harris / Daniel Teachey
2026-07-29 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · LOCH.Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-22 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Anoop Gudipudi / Jason Hall
2026-07-21 · LOCH.Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-06-29 · LOCH.Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charles Newsome
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-11 · LOCH.Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Cutler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · LOCH.Baldwin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · LOCH.Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dan Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-26 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-16 · LOCH.Reynolds · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
William Adams / Raj Butalia
2026-03-31 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58.6%
17W–12L · 54% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.1% of games
6.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 55.3% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
7 matches
#3 Singles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
7%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova