← Search

Julie Mullins

— year-end
56 matches · 16W–40L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Julie Mullins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Musgrave
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L
Terri Smith / Angela Wood
2026-09-01 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joana Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-3
L
2026-08-20 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jackie Renner Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Tracy Pope / Cindy Miller
2026-08-18 · Churchey/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicole Brkic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · Churchey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joana Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
Lisa Evans / Brandi Tomlinson
2026-07-28 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alyssa Pahules
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · Gonzalez/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Brkic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Churchey/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joana Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-05 · Stockton/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · Churchey/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joana Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-22 · Stockton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Paige
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-10 · Churchey/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Churchey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Teams52 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 43.8% of games
4.0
0%
0W–12L · 21.5% of games
6.5
40%
4W–6L · 46.9% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert