← Search

Paige Vaughan

— year-end
57 matches · 28W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Paige Vaughan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicci Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
JoAnn Cooper / Brooke Smith
2026-08-26 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Libby Nabors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · Nabors/ Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer London
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jill Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-21 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Terrie Dietsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dorothy Work
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Eckelkamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · London/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sophia Runer Folk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Owen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-09 · London/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Mcguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-09 · Eckelkamp/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Libby Nabors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 60.5% of games
3.5
34.4%
11W–21L · 45.2% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova