← Search

Alexandria Keith

Salt Lake City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 52W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alexandria Keith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-04-27 · Wasatch Hills-Flowers/Foy · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Electra Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-09 · Wasatch Hills-Flowers/Foy · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ellie Flowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-06 · Eccles- Third Set Squad · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Quinn Pritchett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-09-19 · Wasatch Hills-Flowers · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Long Le mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-08 · Second Set Squad · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ryan Fyfe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-07-25 · Second Set Squad · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with JJ Amaya mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-30 · Wasatch Hills-Wasted Tale · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andres J J Gonzalez Roa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-05-29 · Wasatch Hills-Flower Power · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teri Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-15 · Wasatch Hills-Flower Power · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shanda Stoner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-01 · Wasatch Hills-Flower Power · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cherstin Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2025-04-24 · Wasatch Hills-Flower Power · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shanda Stoner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-04-17 · Wasatch Hills-Flower Power · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 49.4% of games
4.5
45.2%
19W–23L · 48.3% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.6% of games
8.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 50.4% of games
9.0mixed
52.2%
12W–11L · 50.1% of games
9.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer