← Search

Wes Watson

Cary, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
282 matches · 154W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Wes Watson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history282 matches
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Sayko · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Gaurav Luther
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Ja.Hull18C · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Jeffrey Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-13 · LOCH.Gloer · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · LOCH.Gloer · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · Ja.Hull18C · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Thomas Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · TOC.Sayko · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Ryan Sayko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-03 · LOCH.Gloer · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6
W
Casey Black / Karen Griffin
2026-08-02 · Pa.Mital18M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexis Galloway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · LOCH.Gloer · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-26 · Pa.Mital18M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexis Galloway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-1
L
2026-07-20 · LOCH.Gloer · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · Pa.Mital18M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Songkakul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
54.6%
95W–79L · 52.6% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
8.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 57% of games
9.5
41.7%
15W–21L · 50.9% of games
0.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29.4% of games
4.5mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 51.7% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
43 matches
#2 Singles
14%
39 matches
#1 Singles
13%
36 matches
#3 Singles
4%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer