← Search

Meng Zhang

— year-end
65 matches · 29W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Meng Zhang to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
L
2026-06-09 · Match Wiser · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · Match Wiser · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tong Zhang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-6
W
2026-04-30 · West Meadows / C. Martinez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · West Meadows / C. Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-02-12 · Flight winner/West Meadows Ritas - C. Martinez · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-29 · Flight winner/West Meadows Ritas - C. Martinez · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Strickland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-01-15 · Flight winner/West Meadows Ritas - C. Martinez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Estrella Rodriguez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-08-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Geary
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-2
W
2025-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Stack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-07-23 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-06-17 · NJ: Match Wise · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hazel-Ann Rodney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-06-10 · NJ: Match Wise · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Deguines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 61.5% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 58% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 54.8% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.2% of games
7.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 31.4% of games
8.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer