← Search

Sarah England

— year-end
48 matches · 12W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah England to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
L
2026-04-26 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Yenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Yenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-08 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Haikal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · Ross/Rehnquist (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Haikal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-3
W
2025-11-16 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oksana Cottone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-09 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Scherrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-26 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dina Scherrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-10-05 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Haikal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-07 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cris Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2024-09-08 · Ross/Rehnquist (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Yenzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-03-24 · Criner/Albrecht (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Criner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-03-03 · Criner/Albrecht (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Teams12 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 43.4% of games
4.0
20.6%
7W–27L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova