← Search

Chris Turner

Topeka, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 52W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Chris Turner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-08-10 · Soul Crushers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Jolley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-08 · Soul Crushers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Jolley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-08 · Soul Crushers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Meier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · Soul Crushers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicole Meier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-18 · Soul Crushers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dana Jolley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Hopkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-11 · KS/Seitz/40&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · Reedy, Mark · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Reedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · Reedy, Mark · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Packard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-28 · Reedy, Mark · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Packard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 58.8% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81.2%
13W–3L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams