← Search

Craig Pollen

Elkins Park, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 46W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Craig Pollen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-08-14 · Logan 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Terry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · Logan 8.0 55+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Knoblock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · Logan Boys · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Purcell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · Logan Boys · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Purcell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · The Beasts 55+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ada Martini mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-08 · The Beasts 55+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ivy Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-12-21 · The Beasts 55+ · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pamela Kane mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-16 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Constantini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Purcell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-2
L
Patrick Carretas / Indrajeet Joglekar
2025-07-26 · Logan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Purcell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Gassenheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kenneth Leese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
50%
11W–11L · 52.5% of games
4.5
30%
3W–7L · 40.4% of games
8.0
86.2%
25W–4L · 67.7% of games
9.0
100%
4W–0L · 60.6% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 54.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams