← Search

Troy Thomasson

— year-end
63 matches · 34W–29L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Troy Thomasson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-06-06 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randal Nadolny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · Granger, Nathan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-28 · Granger, Nathan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-14 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-17 · Granger, Nathan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-10-18 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-17 · Murphy, Susan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cheryl Vaught mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-27 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-26 · Murphy, Susan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Root mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-12 · Murphy, Susan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Bail mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-06-15 · HOA/Granger/55&over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randal Nadolny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-04 · HOA/Granger/55&over7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randal Nadolny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Teams27 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
56.5%
26W–20L · 51.8% of games
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.7% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer