← Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.21 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult 40 & over/3.5W8128821243
2GEPTA-Cartwright/Adult 40 & over/3.5W72261030299
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Baeza)(FB)72211534289
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Olmos)(EPTC#3)63231332293
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gallagher)(NMSU)54211533307
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gutierrez)(EPTC#2)45132349350
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Abbud)(CCC#2)36142248366
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)36112553379
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Allen)(TW#1)27142250372
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Cardenas)(CCC#1)0992759396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Gabriela Stoiber
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Jammie Price
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Adriana Galindo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.94
Irma Portillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.84
Esther Orona
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3
2.68
Alison Krattiger
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.44
Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
—
Hilda Espinoza
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published —
—
Krista Dennis
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published —
—
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —
—
Marisol Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —
—
Patricia Jacobes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —
—
Raquel Sanchez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 36% · published —
—
Roshelly Paliza
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published —
—
Sara Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 48%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —
—
Sharon Ransom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —
—
Veronica Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eufemia Garcia + Jammie Price4–350% games+11.3% vs expected
Eufemia Garcia + Patricia Jacobes4–354% games+5.1% vs expected
Eufemia Garcia + Sharon Ransom16–1252% games+3.3% vs expected
Adriana Galindo + Marisol Ramirez12–1646% games−2.5% vs expected
Maria del Carmen Ledezma + Sara Blanco6–1045% gamesnot enough data
Eufemia Garcia + Sara Blanco0–931% gamesnot enough data
Veronica Gonzalez + Sara Blanco3–550% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Jacobes + Jammie Price3–358% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gabriela Stoiber
65W–58L career · 27 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Jammie Price
47W–44L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Adriana Galindo
27W–50L career · 10 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Irma Portillo
21W–40L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Esther Orona
115W–106L career · 37 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Alison Krattiger
29W–54L career · 37 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Eufemia Garcia
81W–124L career · type A · 32 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
—
Hilda Espinoza
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Krista Dennis
31W–27L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Maria del Carmen Ledezma
22W–46L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Marisol Ramirez
47W–79L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Patricia Jacobes
55W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Raquel Sanchez
10W–6L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Roshelly Paliza
21W–31L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Sara Blanco
48W–72L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Sharon Ransom
66W–105L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Veronica Gonzalez
50W–71L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.