← Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Baeza)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult 40 & over/3.5W8128821243
2GEPTA-Cartwright/Adult 40 & over/3.5W72261030299
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Baeza)(FB)72211534289
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Olmos)(EPTC#3)63231332293
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gallagher)(NMSU)54211533307
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gutierrez)(EPTC#2)45132349350
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Abbud)(CCC#2)36142248366
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)36112553379
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Allen)(TW#1)27142250372
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Cardenas)(CCC#1)0992759396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Helga Sauza
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.27
Gerla Gallardo
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.27
Isela Rayon
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.22
Claire Brandon
usually #2 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
3.20
Erika Centeno
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Guadalupe Castillo
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.16
Guadalupe Saenz
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.11
Ellen Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
2.80
Ellen Michnovicz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Jeanette Tan
usually #3 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —
—
Margaret Baeza
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published —
—
Patricia Dalbin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 37% · published —
—
Ramona Beard
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published —
—
Rossana Roacho
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —
—
Sarahi Najera
usually #2 Singles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —
—
Ursula Morawietz
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published —
—
Yazmin Pineda
usually #2 Doubles 34%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gerla Gallardo + Guadalupe Castillo12–656% games+0.8% vs expected
Rossana Roacho + Patricia Dalbin33–860% games−1.0% vs expected
Guadalupe Castillo + Ursula Morawietz12–957% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ursula Morawietz7–356% gamesnot enough data
Gerla Gallardo + Ellen Hughes6–261% gamesnot enough data
Isela Rayon + Patricia Dalbin5–255% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Beard + Guadalupe Castillo5–262% gamesnot enough data
Ramona Beard + Margaret Baeza3–447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Helga Sauza
76W–39L career · 32 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Gerla Gallardo
96W–61L career · 36 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Isela Rayon
57W–46L career · type A · 24 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Claire Brandon
35W–45L career · 17 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Erika Centeno
36W–25L career · 37 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Guadalupe Castillo
92W–65L career · 19 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Guadalupe Saenz
72W–59L career · 21 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Ellen Hughes
76W–84L career · 22 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Ellen Michnovicz
45W–70L career · 8 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
—
Jeanette Tan
39W–51L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Margaret Baeza
23W–26L career · 20 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Patricia Dalbin
95W–70L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Ramona Beard
54W–59L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Rossana Roacho
118W–114L career · 39 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Sarahi Najera
69W–38L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Ursula Morawietz
39W–28L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Yazmin Pineda
42W–36L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.