← Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Abbud)(CCC#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.36 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings10 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Alarcon/Adult 40 & over/3.5W8128821243
2GEPTA-Cartwright/Adult 40 & over/3.5W72261030299
3GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Baeza)(FB)72211534289
4GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Olmos)(EPTC#3)63231332293
5GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gallagher)(NMSU)54211533307
6GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Gutierrez)(EPTC#2)45132349350
7GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Abbud)(CCC#2)36142248366
8GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Garcia)(EPTC#1)36112553379
9GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Allen)(TW#1)27142250372
10GEPTA-3.5-Adult/40+W(Cardenas)(CCC#1)0992759396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Adriana Zaragoza
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Berenice Loubet
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.20
Georgina Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Abbud
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published 3.5
3.06
Elva Malooly
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.80
Fadia Ghaleb
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.77
Ana Baca
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
—
Kristine Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —
—
Lia Davalos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published —
—
Marcia Zaragoza
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —
—
Maria Baeza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published —
—
Maya I Quevedo
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published —
—
Melissa Isaac
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published —
—
Sarvelia Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published —
—
Vanessa Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 19% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Zaragoza + Adriana Zaragoza8–556% games+10.4% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Elva Malooly4–354% games+7.9% vs expected
Melissa Isaac + Sarvelia Diaz4–646% games+6.8% vs expected
Elva Malooly + Sarvelia Diaz6–848% games+5.0% vs expected
Adriana Zaragoza + Melissa Isaac15–1651% games+2.5% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Georgina Munoz3–1537% games+0.7% vs expected
Marcia Zaragoza + Sarvelia Diaz4–545% games−4.5% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Melissa Isaac3–643% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriana Zaragoza
44W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
3.5
Berenice Loubet
33W–32L career · 16 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Georgina Munoz
33W–79L career · 16 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Claudia Abbud
52W–103L career · 19 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Elva Malooly
23W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Fadia Ghaleb
13W–30L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Ana Baca
42W–42L career · 30 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
—
Kristine Garcia
23W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Lia Davalos
24W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Marcia Zaragoza
35W–63L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Maria Baeza
58W–35L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Maya I Quevedo
29W–37L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Melissa Isaac
107W–107L career · 34 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Sarvelia Diaz
49W–88L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Vanessa Herrera
45W–66L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.