← Search

Cathie Hopkins

— year-end
67 matches · 31W–36L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Cathie Hopkins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2022-06-25 · Meigs, Barbara · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Westermajer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-05-16 · Marianne McGrath · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Bazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-05-09 · Marianne McGrath · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Westermajer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2022-05-02 · Marianne McGrath · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Bazzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-04-25 · Marianne McGrath · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Levalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L
2022-04-24 · Meigs, Barbara · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Westermajer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2022-04-18 · Marianne McGrath · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Levalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2022-04-03 · Meigs, Barbara · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Dark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2022-03-06 · Meigs, Barbara · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Levalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2022-02-05 · Meigs, Barbara · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Levalley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2022-01-29 · Meigs, Barbara · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2022-01-16 · Meigs, Barbara · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Teams15 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.1% of games
3.5
38.9%
14W–22L · 45.8% of games
4.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 62.3% of games
8.0
20%
1W–4L · 31.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams