← Search

Jack Pyritz

Wake Forest, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 23W–16L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jack Pyritz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Re.Procter55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Procter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Ma.Osborn55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mitch Strobin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Re.Procter55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Procter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · Re.Procter55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Procter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-24 · Re.Procter55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Mayes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-10 · Re.Procter55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Mayes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Re.Procter55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-27 · Re.Procter55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · with Daniel Breazeale championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · Ma.Osborn55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Breazeale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-25 · Ma.Osborn55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with OLLI-PEKKA Salovaara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-18 · Ma.Osborn55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Kash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.4% of games
7.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.6% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.9% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer