← Search

Victoria Ehly

Annapolis, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 32W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Victoria Ehly to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-09-04 · Walsh/Wofford · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Ruth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · Walsh/Wofford · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Richard Ruth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · Walsh/Wofford · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with William Ravekes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · Griffith/West · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-5
W
2026-07-12 · Wofford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Swartout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · Wofford · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Hubbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
Gina Dubbe / Frances Gamble
2026-07-09 · Griffith/West · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ladonna Griffith-Lesesne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Griffith/West · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosemary Harty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
W
2026-07-06 · Wofford · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Cecil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-29 · Wofford · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bonnie Cecil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-21 · Wofford · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Koepp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Wofford · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karin Mottus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
57.9%
11W–8L · 61.8% of games
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 45.1% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.1% of games
6.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 44.8% of games
7.0
20%
3W–12L · 32.4% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal