← Search

Maren Riehm

— year-end
84 matches · 37W–47L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Maren Riehm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-03-01 · Salisbury - Riehm · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Voth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-02-22 · Salisbury - Riehm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jay Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-01 · Salisbury - Riehm · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michael Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · Salisbury - Riehm · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Zima mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
Christopher Chandler / Nevena Arsic
2025-11-23 · SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Voth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-09 · SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with David Voth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-05 · SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Zima mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-09-13 · SCC Franks/Spiller · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Radhika Thorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-07 · SCC Franks/Spiller · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Radhika Thorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Lucy Davis / Meredith Carr
2025-08-24 · SCC Franks/Spiller · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Capozello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Nikki Cheuk / Monique Foster
2025-08-22 · Salisbury - Otoole · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karen Deaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-08-16 · SCC Franks/Spiller · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
43.6%
17W–22L · 51.3% of games
8.5
50%
8W–8L · 49.5% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.1% of games
9.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 48.3% of games
9.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches
#1 Singles
14%
12 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert