← Search

David Voth

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 28W–36L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add David Voth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · ACAC Hall · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Nedeff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · ACAC Hall · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tommy Bader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · ACAC Hall · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Grant Slegowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · ACAC Hall · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stuart Fulcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · Salisbury - Riehm · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Maren Riehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-02-15 · 17 ACAC Bader · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Ruth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · Salisbury - Riehm · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Beth Gardner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-17 · 17 ACAC Bader · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Ruth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-5
L
Christopher Chandler / Nevena Arsic
2025-11-23 · SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maren Riehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-09 · SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maren Riehm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-09-28 · SCC Zima/Lineberger 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Lafors mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
W
N/A
2025-07-26 · Salisbury - Lineberger · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tommy Bader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
75%
3W–1L · 64.1% of games
4.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 50.4% of games
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.9% of games
8.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.1% of games
9.0mixed
23.1%
3W–10L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer