← Search

Emily Tinervin

Chapel Hill, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 196W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Tinervin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
W
2026-09-09 · VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Lacoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Motsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with Danielle Wilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · ANP.Marks · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Danielle Wilder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · ANP.Marks · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Heidi Steiber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Aline Laborde championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · VDirschl.40.8.5C-HVCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Motsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Ci.Winzenz18T · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aline Laborde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Navarro mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Julien de la Mettrie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · TOC.Daniels · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Richard McClenny mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.5
78%
78W–22L · 63.2% of games
5.0
20%
2W–8L · 41% of games
8.5
80.4%
37W–9L · 61% of games
9.5
65.4%
17W–9L · 56% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
4.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 60.4% of games
9.0mixed
71%
22W–9L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
123 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
69 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#1 Singles
6%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal