← Search

Ann Rizzo

Newark, DE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 129W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann Rizzo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
W
2026-08-05 · Racqueteers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dee Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-02 · Schappell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Bragagnolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · Schappell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Beeson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Robin Laperle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Burnett/Mitchell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dee Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-14 · Dupont Divas · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Bragagnolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Catherine Quigley / Jennifer Jones
2026-07-08 · Dupont Divas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · Racqueteers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Laperle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · Schappell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Bragagnolo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · Burnett/Mitchell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dee Burnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · Schappell · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · Racqueteers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Baczkowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
66.7%
18W–9L · 61.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 62.1% of games
8.0
76.1%
51W–16L · 62.6% of games
8.0mixed
67.4%
29W–14L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
91 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
36 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert