← Search

Jennifer Bragagnolo

Wilmington, DE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 76W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Bragagnolo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-08-02 · Schappell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Rizzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-14 · Dupont Divas · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Rizzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Strong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Schappell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Rizzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · Dupont Divas · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robin Laperle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-08 · Schappell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Beeson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Schappell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Rizzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-09-27 · #3 Doubles · with Ann Rizzo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-09-27 · #1 Doubles · with Ann Rizzo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.4% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 50.7% of games
8.0
78%
39W–11L · 62.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova