← Search

Catherine Brawner

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
206 matches · 112W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Brawner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history206 matches
L
2026-09-04 · Ca.Brawner40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elisebeth Gelardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-31 · Ja.Terrell55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Breazeale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-28 · Li.Ihly55C · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kim McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-23 · Di.Williams55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Doninger Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · Re.Procter55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew May mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-01 · Re.Procter55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Hamlett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · Re.Procter55M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Tombs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
Laura Davidson / Theresa Stone
2026-05-28 · Di.Williams55T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberley Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-24 · Su.Greer55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberley Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · Su.Greer55A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
Karen Conley / Beth Johnson
2026-04-01 · Ki.Matthews40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-30 · Ki.Matthews40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Doninger Greer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
57.5%
50W–37L · 51.9% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.3% of games
8.5
55.8%
29W–23L · 55.6% of games
9.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
64.7%
11W–6L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
50 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal