← Search

Jeff Abercrombie

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 195W–111L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeff Abercrombie to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history306 matches
L
William Edwards / Bruce Elder
2026-08-26 · Sh.Lav55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Eric Moritz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Jo.Hoomani40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bradley Eisenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-19 · Sh.Lav55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jack Werder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Jo.Hoomani40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jack Werder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · Sh.Lav55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jack Werder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-03 · Ph.Gugliotta18M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dafnie Driscoll mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · Jo.Hoomani18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bradley Eisenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · Jo.Hoomani40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jack Werder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · Sh.Lav55M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Hembarsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-17 · Sh.Lav40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Kiel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · Je.Monaghen55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Hembarsky mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-14 · Sh.Lav40M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Regan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams71 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
96%
24W–1L · 75.8% of games
3.5
58%
51W–37L · 54.7% of games
4.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 45.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
74.5%
41W–14L · 59% of games
7.5
60%
9W–6L · 50.5% of games
3.5mixed
63.3%
31W–18L · 56.8% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.2% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 65.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
161 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
59 matches
#1 Singles
2%
7 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe