← Search

Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 79W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Al.Crumpler18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Kouba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · ACrumpler-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with LeAnne Bloedon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-11 · Mo.Hodl40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Ragsdale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Martha Sanders / Amanda Williams
2026-04-30 · Le.Ragsdale18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Vander Vennet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-29 · Le.Ragsdale18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Kelly Johnson / Amy Hoots
2026-04-24 · 1 ACrumpler-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Vander Vennet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · Le.Ragsdale18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-17 · 1 ACrumpler-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-03 · Is.Gesher55A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · Mo.Hodl40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Vander Vennet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-30 · Mo.Hodl40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isabelle Homes Gesher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-26 · Le.Ragsdale18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Vander Vennet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
61.3%
19W–12L · 54.8% of games
4.0
56%
28W–22L · 54% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
65.7%
23W–12L · 56.4% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
39 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert